Honest comparisons
Every tool on this page will tell you whether AI mentions your brand. Only one of them writes and publishes the content that fixes it when the answer is no.
| Platform | From | AI engines | Writes content | Publishes to CMS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auragap | $29/mo | 5 | Yes | Yes |
| Peec AI | ~$95/mo | 6 | No | No |
| Semrush AI Visibility | $99/mo per domain | 4 | No | No |
| GetMentioned | €89/mo | 3 | No | No |
| Profound | $99/mo (ChatGPT only) | 10 | Assistive | No |
Competitor pricing and features as publicly published, verified August 2026. Each comparison page links its sources.
Deep AI visibility monitoring — but monitoring is where it stops.
An add-on to a suite you already pay for — priced like one.
Clean, fast brand monitoring across three engines — and nothing past the report.
The enterprise category leader — priced for enterprise budgets.
AI visibility tools have converged on the same product. They run your prompts against ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini, count how often you are mentioned, show which sources get cited instead of you, and chart it over time. That is genuinely useful — you cannot fix what you cannot see.
But it leaves you exactly where a rank tracker left you in 2010: holding a number that is worse than you would like, with no more idea of what to write than before you logged in. Someone still has to work out which competitor page is being cited, what it covers that yours does not, how to restructure yours so an answer engine can extract it, and then actually write and ship the thing.
Auragap does that part. It scores your page against the pages being cited, produces a blueprint with the exact sections you are missing, drafts the article, and publishes it to your CMS — then re-scans to confirm the gap closed. Monitoring is the first step of the loop, not the product.
Run your first visibility scan across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. From $29/month with a 7-day free trial.
Start free trial